Skip to main content

WCAG 2.2 AA · Automated Scanning

New York website accessibility lawsuits: what the 2025 numbers actually show.

New York does not have one law called a “website accessibility law,” but three legal paths already treat a business website as a place of public accommodation: Title III of the federal Americans with Disabilities Act, the New York State Human Rights Law (Executive Law, Article 15, Section 296), and the New York City Human Rights Law. If your business has a website and serves customers who live in or visit New York, courts here have generally applied one or more of these laws to you, regardless of your size or whether you have a physical location. In 2025, New York businesses faced 1,021 federal website accessibility lawsuits, more than any other state, even though that count fell sharply from the year before.

Last updated October 2026. Filing data reflects full year 2025 federal court records.

Enter your URL. See your New York site's accessibility status. 60 seconds.

60 SECONDS · NO CREDIT CARD · ZERO STORED WITHOUT CONSENT

New York's accessibility laws, and what actually changes

Three separate laws can apply to the same website at the same time, and they do not offer the same remedies.

Title III of the ADA is federal and nationwide. If a plaintiff wins, the usual outcome is an order to fix the site and a payment of the plaintiff's attorney's fees. It does not provide money damages to the plaintiff directly.

The New York State Human Rights Law (Executive Law Section 296) is enforced either through the state's Division of Human Rights or through a private lawsuit, and it allows compensatory damages and civil penalties that federal ADA claims alone do not.

The New York City Human Rights Law applies within New York City and is written, by the City's own Local Civil Rights Restoration Act, to be interpreted more broadly than its state and federal counterparts. It allows compensatory damages with no statutory cap, plus punitive damages, and the NYC Commission on Human Rights can separately pursue civil penalties reported as high as $125,000, or $250,000 where conduct is found willful.

That gap in what each law pays out is the real reason litigation patterns are shifting. A plaintiff who can only get an injunction and fees under federal law has a financial incentive to bring the same claim under New York's state or city human rights laws instead, where actual money is on the table. Combined with federal courts in New York recently applying stricter standing requirements to website cases, this has pushed a meaningful share of filings out of federal court entirely, which is part of why the federal count below has fallen even as underlying litigation activity has not necessarily slowed to the same degree.

Neither statute explicitly writes “WCAG” into the law. In practice, WCAG 2.2 AA has become the standard both settlement agreements and courts point to when deciding whether a site provided equal access, which is why it is the benchmark this page and Axeazy's own scans use.

New York lawsuit filings and settlement data (2025)

YearNew York federal website accessibility lawsuitsChange from prior year
20232,152
20241,564down about 27 percent
20251,021down about 35 percent

New York still filed more federal website accessibility lawsuits than any other state in 2025, but the race is closer than it has been in years. Florida filed 961, nearly double its 2024 total, and is now within 60 cases of New York's number. Illinois moved into third place with 585, up from a much smaller base the year before. Nationally, the trend actually moved the opposite direction from New York's: website accessibility lawsuits across all states rose 27 percent in 2025 to 3,117, the highest total since 2022, largely on the strength of Florida's and Illinois's growth.

This federal count also understates New York's real litigation exposure. It does not include the state and New York City court filings that plaintiffs are increasingly choosing instead, specifically because those courts allow the money damages federal ADA claims do not. Treat 1,021 as a floor, not a ceiling, on how much accessibility litigation is actually happening involving New York businesses.

Typical demand-letter and settlement ranges

Typical demand-letter and settlement ranges, per defense-side reporting rather than any official court record: a business that responds promptly to a demand letter with a documented remediation effort commonly settles for $5,000 to $25,000. Cases that go unanswered, get contested, or reach active litigation commonly run $25,000 to $75,000 or more, on top of separate legal fees either way. Axeazy does not predict the outcome of any individual case, and these ranges are not a quote for what your situation will cost.

See how ADA website lawsuit settlements are calculated.

Source: Seyfarth Shaw's 2025 ADA Title III website accessibility tracking, published March 2026; New York City Human Rights Law civil penalty figures per the NYC Commission on Human Rights' public guidance.

Which businesses in New York are actually being targeted

Industry

Retail and e-commerce sites remain the single most targeted category. Restaurants and hotels follow, largely because online ordering, reservation, and booking flows are easy for a plaintiff to test and document from home.

Venue

The Southern and Eastern Districts of New York have historically been the most active federal venues for these cases. That is shifting somewhat as those same courts have become more demanding about what a plaintiff must show to establish standing, which has pushed some filings toward New York state and city courts, and toward other states such as Illinois.

Filing pattern

A small number of law firms and repeat plaintiffs are responsible for the large majority of New York's website accessibility filings, a pattern confirmed across several years of independent litigation tracking. We are not naming specific firms or plaintiffs here. That detail changes constantly, and getting it wrong in published content would be worse than leaving it out.

Axeazy fixes 14 categories of WCAG violations at the code level, not with an overlay widget, including the alt text, form label, and color contrast issues most often cited in demand letters. See what Axeazy fixes and what it does not.

New York website accessibility: FAQ.

Do small businesses in New York have to meet website accessibility requirements?

Yes, and size alone is not an exemption under any of the three laws that apply here. Courts have applied Title III of the ADA, the New York State Human Rights Law, and the New York City Human Rights Law to small business websites, not just large retailers. Roughly two out of three businesses sued nationally in 2025 had under $25 million in annual revenue.

What does a New York accessibility demand letter usually ask for?

Most New York letters pair a federal Title III claim with the New York State or New York City Human Rights Law, because those laws allow money damages and federal Title III does not. That is why a New York letter usually asks for a payment as well as a written commitment to fix the violations it lists, often with a response window of 30 to 60 days.

Is WCAG legally required in New York?

Not in so many words. No New York statute names WCAG directly as a legal requirement for private business websites. In practice, WCAG 2.2 AA has become the standard both plaintiffs' complaints and settlement agreements point to, so meeting it is the most practical way to reduce your exposure even without a line in the statute that names it.

How much does a New York accessibility lawsuit or demand letter typically cost to resolve?

It depends heavily on how quickly and how thoroughly you respond. A prompt, documented remediation effort after a demand letter commonly resolves for $5,000 to $25,000. Cases that are ignored or reach active litigation commonly run $25,000 to $75,000 or more, and New York City Human Rights Law claims add the possibility of uncapped compensatory damages plus civil penalties. These are reported ranges, not a quote for your situation.

See what is actually wrong with your site.

Free, 60 second scan. No credit card required.

60 SECONDS · NO CREDIT CARD · ZERO STORED WITHOUT CONSENT

Scope of this analysis

SCOPE LIMITATION: This report documents violations identified by automated WCAG 2.2 AA scanning using axe-core v4.11.0. Automated tools identify approximately 30 to 40% of all WCAG criteria. This report does not constitute legal advice, guarantee ADA compliance, or protect against legal action. ADA compliance is a legal determination made by courts. For full WCAG conformance assessment, engage an IAAP-certified accessibility professional.

Sources: Seyfarth Shaw, “Federal Court Website Accessibility Lawsuit Filings Bounce Back in 2025” (March 2026); UsableNet 2025 Midyear ADA Digital Accessibility Lawsuit Report; New York Executive Law Article 15, Section 296; New York City Human Rights Law (NYC Administrative Code Title 8). New York count reflects full year 2025 federal filings.

New York's plaintiff firms also file heavily in New Jersey and, since 2025, in Illinois, and Florida now trails New York's federal count by only 60 cases. See New Jersey lawsuit data, Illinois lawsuit data, Florida lawsuit data, or see all 10 states.