Skip to main content

WCAG 2.2 AA · Automated Scanning

Florida website accessibility lawsuits: what the 2025 numbers actually show.

Florida does not have a law that specifically requires business websites to be accessible, and the state's own federal appeals court has never actually settled the underlying legal question. That has not slowed the lawsuits down. Florida businesses faced 961 federal website accessibility lawsuits in 2025, nearly double the year before, brought under Title III of the federal Americans with Disabilities Act and, in many cases, the Florida Civil Rights Act at the same time. Most of these cases settle long before any court reaches the unresolved legal question. Here is what that means if you run a site based in, or selling to, Florida.

Last updated October 2026. Filing data reflects full year 2025 federal court records.

Enter your URL. See your Florida site's accessibility status. 60 seconds.

60 SECONDS · NO CREDIT CARD · ZERO STORED WITHOUT CONSENT

Florida's accessibility laws, and the question courts have not settled

Two legal paths apply to a Florida business website, and a third question sits underneath both of them, unresolved.

Title III of the ADA is the federal baseline. A win typically results in an order to fix the site and payment of the plaintiff's attorney's fees, not direct money damages.

The Florida Civil Rights Act (FCRA) is Florida's state-level counterpart, enforced through the Florida Commission on Human Relations. It is regularly pleaded alongside a federal ADA claim in the same lawsuit, which gives a plaintiff's attorney a second legal theory and generally more leverage in settlement talks. Florida does not have a fixed per-violation damages amount the way California's Unruh Act does.

The unresolved question is whether a website counts as a “place of public accommodation” on its own, or only when it has a close enough connection to a physical location. In April 2021, the Eleventh Circuit, which covers Florida, Georgia, and Alabama, ruled in Gil v. Winn-Dixie that a website by itself does not count. That decision sounded like a clear win for businesses. It was not the end of the story: in December 2021, the same court vacated its own ruling after concluding the underlying case had gone moot, which means that decision no longer carries any binding legal weight. Florida currently has no controlling appellate answer on this question, and federal district courts within the state have reached different conclusions case by case in the years since. Businesses that assume Gil v. Winn-Dixie protects them from these claims are relying on a ruling that no longer legally exists.

WCAG is not named directly in either statute. In practice, WCAG 2.2 AA is the benchmark that settlement agreements and court filings point to when deciding whether a site provided equal access.

Florida lawsuit filings and settlement data (2025)

YearFlorida federal website accessibility lawsuitsChange from prior year
2023385
2024470up about 22 percent
2025961up about 105 percent, nearly double

Florida's growth is the sharpest of any major filing state in 2025. Its 961 filings now trail New York's 1,021 by only 60 cases, the narrowest gap between the two states in years. If the current trend continues, Florida is a realistic candidate to take the top spot nationally in 2026, though that is a trend, not a prediction Axeazy is making about any specific outcome.

Typical demand-letter and settlement ranges

Typical demand-letter and settlement ranges, per defense-side reporting rather than any official court record: commonly $15,000 to $60,000, with cases that are ignored or escalate to active litigation tending toward the higher end of that range or beyond, on top of separate legal fees either way. Axeazy does not predict the outcome of any individual case.

See how ADA website lawsuit settlements are calculated.

Source: Seyfarth Shaw's 2025 ADA Title III website accessibility tracking, published March 2026.

Which businesses in Florida are actually being targeted

Industry

E-commerce sites see the most claims. Restaurants and healthcare sites follow. Florida's tourism economy adds a pattern that shows up less in other states: hotels and other lodging businesses face a specific federal requirement, separate from the general public accommodation question, to describe accessible room and property features through their reservation systems in enough detail for a guest to assess independently whether a room meets their needs. A number of Florida cases have focused narrowly on that requirement rather than on general site accessibility.

Venue

Filings are spread across Florida's federal districts, most visibly the Southern District. Plaintiffs continue to file despite the unresolved appellate question described above, often by alleging a specific connection between the website and a physical store, restaurant, or hotel property to work around it.

Filing pattern

A small number of law firms and repeat plaintiffs, several of whom have expanded into Florida from cases originally filed in New York and California, are responsible for a large share of the state's filings, a pattern confirmed across multiple years of independent litigation tracking. We are not naming specific firms or plaintiffs. That detail changes constantly, and Axeazy cannot independently verify it case by case.

If you have received a demand letter and are not sure what happens next, see the step by step walkthrough on what an ADA demand letter actually asks for and how to respond.

Axeazy fixes 14 categories of WCAG violations at the code level, not with an overlay widget, including the alt text, form label, and color contrast issues most often cited in demand letters. See what Axeazy fixes and what it does not.

Florida website accessibility: FAQ.

Do small businesses in Florida have to meet website accessibility requirements?

There is no Florida statute that names website accessibility directly, and the state's federal appeals court has not settled whether a website alone counts as a place of public accommodation. Courts have still allowed claims to proceed where a website has a clear connection to a physical business, and size alone has not been treated as an exemption. Roughly two out of three businesses sued nationally in 2025 had under $25 million in annual revenue.

Is Florida protected from website accessibility lawsuits because of Gil v. Winn-Dixie?

No. The Eleventh Circuit's 2021 ruling in that case was vacated by the same court later that year after the underlying case was found moot, so it no longer has binding legal force. Florida currently has no controlling appellate decision on this question either way.

What does a Florida accessibility demand letter usually ask for?

Florida letters typically cite Title III, often with the Florida Civil Rights Act as a second legal theory. Because the Eleventh Circuit never settled whether a website alone is covered, many Florida letters tie the website to a physical store, restaurant, or hotel. Hotels may instead get a narrower claim about whether their reservation system describes accessible rooms in enough detail.

How much does a Florida accessibility lawsuit typically cost to resolve?

Reported Florida ranges commonly run $15,000 to $60,000, before separate legal fees. Florida's civil rights law sets no fixed per violation amount the way California's does, so the figure mostly tracks how quickly you respond and how far the claim has gone. These are reported ranges, not a quote.

See what is actually wrong with your site.

Free, 60 second scan. No credit card required.

60 SECONDS · NO CREDIT CARD · ZERO STORED WITHOUT CONSENT

Scope of this analysis

SCOPE LIMITATION: This report documents violations identified by automated WCAG 2.2 AA scanning using axe-core v4.11.0. Automated tools identify approximately 30 to 40% of all WCAG criteria. This report does not constitute legal advice, guarantee ADA compliance, or protect against legal action. ADA compliance is a legal determination made by courts. For full WCAG conformance assessment, engage an IAAP-certified accessibility professional.

Sources: Seyfarth Shaw, “Federal Court Website Accessibility Lawsuit Filings Bounce Back in 2025” (March 2026); Florida Civil Rights Act, Florida Statutes Chapter 760; Gil v. Winn-Dixie Stores, 11th Cir., vacated Dec. 2021; 28 C.F.R. Section 36.302(e); UsableNet 2025 Midyear ADA Digital Accessibility Lawsuit Report. Florida count reflects full year 2025 federal filings.

Georgia sits in the same federal circuit as Florida, so the same unresolved legal question applies there, and New York is the only state that saw more federal website lawsuits in 2025. See Georgia website accessibility law, New York lawsuit data, or see all 10 states.